ArticleJournal of vision2024
Continuous psychophysics shows millisecond-scale visual processing delays are faithfully preserved in movement dynamics.
Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bandwidth of gamma-distribution-shaped functions via Lambert W function.Statistics & probability letters · 2026Article
- Article
- A Common Prescription Lens Correction Causes Motion Illusions in the Presbyopic and General Populations.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Depth perception changes following adaptation to cue-dependent invariants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Monovision-induced motion illusions in presbyopic and non-presbyopic populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ebbinghaus Illusion Distortions in Amblyopia: Impairments of Visual Size Processing and Interocular Integration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Revealing temporal dynamics of the visuomotor system via continuous tracking of position and attribute.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Measuring spatial and temporal properties of visual crowding using continuous psychophysics.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- Motion Misperception in Anisomyopia Before and After Optical Correction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- How distinct sources of nuisance variability in natural images and scenes limit human stereopsis.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Decreases in overall light level increase the severity of the reverse Pulfrich effect.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Temporal dynamics of human color processing measured using a continuous tracking task.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Continuous temporal integration in the human visual system.Journal of vision · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Image differences between the eyes can cause interocular discrepancies in the speed of visual processing. Millisecond-scale differences in visual processing speed can cause dramatic misperceptions of the depth and three-dimensional direction of moving objects. Here, we develop a monocular and binocular continuous target-tracking psychophysics paradigm that can quantify such tiny differences in visual processing speed. Human observers continuously tracked a target undergoing Brownian motion with a range of luminance levels in each eye. Suitable analyses recover the time course of the visuomotor response in each condition, the dependence of visual processing speed on luminance level, and the temporal evolution of processing differences between the eyes. Importantly, using a direct within-observer comparison, we show that continuous target-tracking and traditional forced-choice psychophysical methods provide estimates of interocular delays that agree on average to within a fraction of a millisecond. Thus, visual processing delays are preserved in the movement dynamics of the hand. Finally, we show analytically, and partially confirm experimentally, that differences between the temporal impulse response functions in the two eyes predict how lateral target motion causes misperceptions of motion in depth and associated tracking responses. Because continuous target tracking can accurately recover millisecond-scale differences in visual processing speed and has multiple advantages over traditional psychophysics, it should facilitate the study of temporal processing in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.