Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721890›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry2024

Comparison of three machine learning algorithms for classification of B-cell neoplasms using clinical flow cytometry data.

Wikum Dinalankara, David P Ng, Luigi Marchionni, Paul D Simonson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wikum DinalankaraDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
David P NgDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8604-2073
Luigi MarchionniDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Paul D SimonsonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Resource Sharing CoreU54CA273956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Amit Sawant, Nicole L Simone · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
Hardwiring Mechanism into Predicting Cancer Phenotypes by Computational LearningR01CA200859 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MARCHIONNI, LUIGI · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell UniversityNCI NIH HHS R01 CA200859NCI NIH HHS U54 CA273956NIH HHS R01CA200859NIH HHS U54CA273956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparameter flow cytometry data is visually inspected by expert personnel as part of standard clinical disease diagnosis practice. This is a demanding and costly process, and recent research has demonstrated that it is possible to utilize artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to assist in the interpretive process. Here we report our examination of three previously published machine learning methods for classification of flow cytometry data and apply these to a B-cell neoplasm dataset to obtain predicted disease subtypes. Each of the examined methods classifies samples according to specific disease categories using ungated flow cytometry data. We compare and contrast the three algorithms with respect to their architectures, and we report the multiclass classification accuracies and relative required computation times. Despite different architectures, two of the methods, flowCat and EnsembleCNN, had similarly good accuracies with relatively fast computational times. We note a speed advantage for EnsembleCNN, particularly in the case of addition of training data and retraining of the classifier.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFlow CytometryMachine LearningB-LymphocytesHumansImmunophenotypingLymphoma, B-CellB‐cell neoplasmsdeep learningflow cytometrymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38721890
PMCPMC11286351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.