Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721700›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2024

General practitioner preferences for telehealth consultations in Australia: a pilot survey and discrete choice experiment.

Keshia R De Guzman, Anthony C Smith, Centaine L Snoswell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keshia R De GuzmanCentre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-2691
Anthony C SmithCentre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7756-5136
Centaine L SnoswellCentre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4298-9369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify and quantify general practitioner (GP) preferences related to service attributes of clinical consultations, including telehealth consultations, in Australia.

backgroundGPs have been increasingly using telehealth to deliver patient care since the onset of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. GP preferences for telehealth service models will play an important role in the uptake and sustainability of telehealth services post-pandemic.

methodsAn online survey was used to ask GPs general telehealth questions and have them complete a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE elicited GP preferences for various service attributes of telehealth (telephone and videoconference) consultations. The DCE investigated five service attributes, including consultation mode, consultation purpose, consultation length, quality of care and rapport, and patient co-payment. Participants were presented with eight choice sets, each containing three options to choose from. Descriptive statistics was used, and mixed logit models were used to estimate and analyse the DCE data.

findingsA total of 60 GPs fully completed the survey. Previous telehealth experiences impacted direct preferences towards telehealth consultations across clinical presentations, although in-person modes were generally favoured (in approximately 70% of all scenarios). The DCE results lacked statistical significance which demonstrated undiscernible differences between GP preferences for some service attributes. However, it was found that GPs prefer to provide a consultation with good quality care and rapport (

Indexed as

COVID-19General PractitionersTelemedicineAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPilot ProjectsReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19economicsgeneral practicepreferencesprimary caretelehealth

Identifiers

PMID38721700
PMCPMC11091543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.