Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721682›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2025

Challenges in downstream dam passage and the effect of dam removal on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolt migrations.

Samuel Shry, Andrew Harbicht, Hanna Forsberg, Anders Nilsson, Gustav Hellström, Martin Österling, Olle Calles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel ShryRiver Ecology and Management, Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1514-0559
Andrew HarbichtDepartment of Fisheries and Oceans, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Hanna ForsbergRiver Ecology and Management, Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Anders NilssonDepartment of Biology-Aquatic ecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Gustav HellströmDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Martin ÖsterlingRiver Ecology and Management, Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Olle CallesRiver Ecology and Management, Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.

Funding

EU-LIFE Program LIFE18 NAT/SE/000742Stiftelsen fr Kunskaps- och Kompetensutveckling 20160160Uniper/Sydkraft Hydropower AB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migration is critical for life-cycle completion in diadromous fish species. River connectivity is vital in facilitating these large-scale movement events, but the extent of present-day river fragmentation can interfere with these migrations. Fish passage solutions (FPSs) are commonly implemented with the aim of improving river connectivity. In our study, we investigated the performance of two types of FPSs, spill regimes and complete dam removal, on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolt migrations. We used acoustic telemetry to monitor migration behavior and passage success of 120 wild smolts released in three different groups/sites: one group with two dams to pass to reach the river mouth, a second group with one dam to pass, and a control group without any barriers to pass (upstream of a recently removed hydroelectric dam). Smolt passage probabilities were similar for the two studied dams (87% and 86%) but showed variation in path choice, delay times, and loss rates. Passage success was influenced by several factors, such as body size, diel period, and water temperature, but not flow. Cumulative passage success to the river mouth was 61%, with most individuals being lost within lentic river stretches, either in the forebays of hydroelectric power stations or in naturally wide river stretches. Within the recently rehabilitated river sections (post dam removal), passage speeds were significantly faster than all other sections of the river (post-rehabilitation x¯ = 56.1 km/day) with significantly faster speeds compared to pre-rehabilitation (pre-x¯ = 28.0 km/day). Our findings provide valuable information on the benefits of dam removal and highlight the need for further rehabilitation measures in upriver reaches where barriers still affect downstream passage.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationRiversSalmo salarAnimalsTelemetryfish passageriver barriersriver restoration

Identifiers

PMID38721682
PMCPMC12120325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.