Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721596›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

The characteristics of intratumoral microbial community reflect the development of lung adenocarcinoma.

Yanfang Su, Shiyu Li, Die Sang, Yurong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Current Roadmap of Lung Cancer Biology, Genomics and Racial Disparity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanfang SuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beijing Chaoyang District Sanhuan Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shiyu LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beijing Chaoyang District Sanhuan Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
Die SangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beijing Chaoyang District Sanhuan Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yurong ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beijing Chaoyang District Sanhuan Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: An increasing number of studies have demonstrated the pivotal role of microbiota changes in the onset, progression, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, a comprehensive analysis of intratumoral microbiome variation across distinct LUAD stages has not been performed. The aim of this study was to identify the microbial markers that significantly vary during tumor stage of LUAD. Methods: Here, we used the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database to comprehensively compare and analyze the differences in microbial composition between 267 patients with early and 224 patients with advanced LUAD. In order to determine the best biomarkers, we used the random forest (RF) model and found that the microbial markers have a certain ability in predicting the stage of LUAD. Results: We found that there were certain differences in the microbiome of patients with LUAD at different stages, especially in the tumor tissues of patients with advanced LUAD, whose co-abundance network was significantly more complex. We also found that five bacterial biomarkers ( Discussion: Our study revealed the microbial profile of patients with LUAD and the intrinsic pathogenic mechanism between the microbiome and the disease, and established a multi-omics model to determine LUAD tumor stage.

Indexed as

co-occurrence networkslung adenocarcinomamicrobiomerandom foresttumor stage

Identifiers

PMID38721596
PMCPMC11076736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.