ArticleJournal of pediatric genetics2024
A Cytogenetic Study of Turkish Children with Global Developmental Delay.
Article in Journal of pediatric genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global developmental delay (GDD)/intellectual disability (ID) is common in children and its etiology is unknown in many cases. Chromosomal abnormalities are predominant genetic causes of GDD/ID. The aim of this study is to determine the genetic risk factors that may be involved in the etiology of GDD/ID. In this study, 810 children with moderate to severe, clinically unexplained GDD/ID for whom cytogenetic analysis were performed were retrospectively rescreened. The results showed that GDD/ID affected more females than males (2 girls:1 boy). A total of 54 children (6.7%) with GDD showed chromosomal aberrations (CAs): 59.3% of these CAs were structural aberrations, and the rest were numerical aberrations (40.7%). Specifically, inversions, deletions, and reciprocal and robertsonian translocations, which were detected in 1, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.4% of the children, respectively, constituted important categories of structural CAs. Among numerical CAs, classic Turner and mosaics were detected in 1.2% of all children. Trisomy 21 and mosaic trisomy 21 were detected in 1% of the children. Marker chromosomes and 47,XXY karyotypes were found in two children each. Our results suggest that female sex is more affected by CAs among GDD/ID cases, and cytogenetic analysis is useful in the etiological diagnosis of GDD/ID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.