Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721576›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric genetics2024

Severity Scoring Cutoff for MLPA and Its Diagnostic Yield in 332 North Indian Children with Developmental Delay.

Priyanka Srivastava, Parminder Kaur, Roshan Daniel, Chakshu Chaudhry, Anit Kaur, Saurabh Seth, Divya Kumari, Anupriya Kaur, Inusha Panigrahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Priyanka SrivastavaGenetic Metabolic Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1840-5711
Parminder KaurGenetic Metabolic Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Roshan DanielGenetic Metabolic Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Chakshu ChaudhryGenetic Metabolic Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Anit KaurAllergy Immunology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Saurabh SethGenetic Metabolic Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Divya KumariGenetic Metabolic Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Anupriya KaurGenetic Metabolic Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Inusha PanigrahiGenetic Metabolic Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal aberrations/rearrangements are the most common cause of intellectual disability (ID), developmental delay (DD), and congenital malformations. Traditionally, karyotyping has been the investigation of choice in such cases, with the advantage of being cheap and easily accessible, but with the caveat of the inability to detect copy number variations of sizes less than 5 Mb. Chromosomal microarray can solve this problem, but again the problems of expense and poor availability are major challenges in developing countries. The purpose of this study is to find the utility of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a middle ground, in a resource-limited setting. We also attempted to establish an optimum cutoff for the de Vries score, to enable physicians to decide between these tests on a case-to-case basis, using only clinical data. A total of 332 children with DD/ID with or without facial dysmorphism and congenital malformations were studied by MLPA probe sets P245. Assessment of clinical variables concerning birth history, facial dysmorphism, congenital malformations, and family history was done. We also scored the de Vries scoring for all the patients to find a suitable cutoff for MLPA screening. In our study, the overall detection rate of MLPA was 13.5% (45/332). The majority of patients were DiGeorge's syndrome with probe deletion in 22q11.21 in 3.3% (11/332) followed by 15q11.2 del in 3.6% (12/332, split between Angelman's and Prader-Willi's syndromes). Also, 3.0% (10/332) of patients were positive for Williams-Beuren's syndrome 7q11.23, 1.8% (6/332) for Wolf--Hirschhorn's syndrome 4p16.3, 1.2% (4/332) for 1p36 deletion, and 1% for each trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type I 8q23.3 duplication syndrome and cri du chat syndrome. The optimum cutoff of de Vries score for MLPA testing in children with ID and/or dysmorphism came out to be 2.5 (rounded off to 3) with a sensitivity of 82.2% and specificity of 66.7%. This is the largest study from India for the detection of chromosomal aberrations using MLPA common microdeletion kit P245. Our study suggests that de Vries score with a cutoff of 3 or more can be used to offer MLPA as the first tier test for patients with unexplained ID, with or without facial dysmorphism and congenital malformations.

Indexed as

chromosomal aberrationscopy number variationsde Vries scoringmultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

Identifiers

PMID38721576
PMCPMC11076085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.