ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Differential effect of China's Zero Markup Drug Policy on provider-induced demand in secondary and tertiary hospitals.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The differential impact of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) on hierarchical hospitals: an interrupted time series analysis on health expenditure structure.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Economic Evaluation of Multi-Objective Schistosomiasis Control Through Systemic Causality: Theoretical Advances and Governance Implications.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- Influencing factors of hospitalization costs for patients with subsequent osteoporotic hip fractures: multilevel model analysis by fracture episode.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Trends and determinants of hospitalization costs for umbilical hernia: a 13-year retrospective analysis from 2012 to 2024.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Zero-Markup Drug Policy's Effects on Financial Burden and Pharmaceutical Channel Migration: A Structural Variation and Interrupted Time Series Analysis from Hubei, China.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Article
- The universal zero markup drug policy and gastric cancer hospitalization expenses: an analysis of trends and influencing factors in Shanghai from 2014 to 2021.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and economic burden of Alzheimer's disease inpatients in Hubei Province, China: a retrospective analysis of hospitalization costs and length of stay.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Analysis of structural variations and effects of the national volume-based procurement policy on inpatient costs: a real world study of osteoporotic hip fractures in Shanghai, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the marketization of China's health system in the 1980's, the government allowed public hospitals to markup the price of certain medications by 15% to compensate for reduced revenue from government subsidies. This incentivized clinicians to induce patient demand for drugs which resulted in higher patient out-of-pocket payments, higher overall medical expenditure, and poor health outcomes. In 2009, China introduced the Zero Markup Drug Policy (ZMDP) which eliminated the 15% markup. Using Shanghai as a case study, this paper analyzes emerging and existing evidence about the impact of ZMDP on hospital expenditure and revenue across secondary and tertiary public hospitals. We use data from 150 public hospitals across Shanghai to examine changes in hospital expenditure and revenue for various health services following the implementation of ZMDP. Our analysis suggests that, across both secondary and tertiary hospitals, the implementation of ZMDP reduced expenditure on drugs but increased expenditure on medical services, exams, and tests thereby increasing hospital revenue and keeping inpatient and outpatient costs unchanged. Moreover, our analysis suggests that tertiary facilities increased their revenue at a faster rate than secondary facilities, likely due to their ability to prescribe more advanced and, therefore, more costly procedures. While rigorous experimental designs are needed to confirm these findings, it appears that ZMDP has not reduced instances of medical expenditure provoked by provider-induced demand (PID) but rather shifted the effect of PID from one revenue source to another with differential effects in secondary vs. tertiary hospitals. Supplemental policies are likely needed to address PID and reduce patient costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.