ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Neuroimaging in atypical normal tension glaucoma: debating routine implementation in the absence of classic neurological findings.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glaucoma mimickers: Avoiding diagnostic traps in low-resource ophthalmic practice.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical and Neuroimaging Findings in Patients with Atypical Visual Field Defects.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
- Pituitary and Optic Tract Lesions Masquerading As Glaucoma: Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges.Cureus · 2025Article
- Discriminating Diseases Mimicking Normal-Tension Glaucoma (NTG) from NTG.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Neuro-opthalmic Conditions Misdiagnosed as Glaucoma: A Retrospective Study of Cases and Contributing Factors in a Developing Setting.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the necessity of neuroimaging in patients with neurological or atypical findings of normal tension glaucoma (NTG) who do not exhibit typical glaucoma manifestations.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 90 atypical NTG patients who underwent cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to atypical symptoms. The demographic characteristics, clinical parameters, and radiological findings were recorded.
resultsAmong the patients, 66.7% had abnormal radiology results, with the most common findings being gliosis (34.4%), sequelae of cerebrovascular events and vascular malformations (14.4%), and benign intracranial mass lesions (11%). Non-glaucomatous visual field defects were more frequently observed in patients with abnormal neuroimaging results. However, there were no significant differences in intraocular pressure, optic disc parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and visual field indices between patients with normal and abnormal radiological results. The mean age of the patients was 58.74y. Interestingly, there was a significant age difference, with the abnormal radiology group having a higher median age (
conclusionThe study highlights the importance of cranial imaging in older NTG patients to detect underlying pathologies and prevent misdiagnosis. It suggests that neuroimaging may be warranted in NTG patients with atypical visual field defects incompatible with glaucoma. However, routine neuroimaging in all NTG patients without classic neurological signs may not be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.