ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Meibomian glands segmentation in infrared images with limited annotation.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the reliability of non-cycloplegic refraction in children: a machine learning approach based on non-cycloplegic parameters.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Associations between quantitative ocular surface features and CT morphology of the levator palpebrae superioris complex in patients with thyroid eye disease and upper eyelid retraction: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- AI driven quantitative analysis of meibomian glands in children and adolescents: a benchmark dataset study.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Article
- Development and multicenter validation of an AI driven model for quantitative meibomian gland evaluation.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Dual U-Net with multi-task attention for automated eyelid curvature quantification.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Meibomian gland alterations in allergic conjunctivitis: insights from a novel quantitative analysis algorithm.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate a pioneering framework for the segmentation of meibomian glands (MGs), using limited annotations to reduce the workload on ophthalmologists and enhance the efficiency of clinical diagnosis.
methodsTotally 203 infrared meibomian images from 138 patients with dry eye disease, accompanied by corresponding annotations, were gathered for the study. A rectified scribble-supervised gland segmentation (RSSGS) model, incorporating temporal ensemble prediction, uncertainty estimation, and a transformation equivariance constraint, was introduced to address constraints imposed by limited supervision information inherent in scribble annotations. The viability and efficacy of the proposed model were assessed based on accuracy, intersection over union (IoU), and dice coefficient.
resultsUsing manual labels as the gold standard, RSSGS demonstrated outcomes with an accuracy of 93.54%, a dice coefficient of 78.02%, and an IoU of 64.18%. Notably, these performance metrics exceed the current weakly supervised state-of-the-art methods by 0.76%, 2.06%, and 2.69%, respectively. Furthermore, despite achieving a substantial 80% reduction in annotation costs, it only lags behind fully annotated methods by 0.72%, 1.51%, and 2.04%.
conclusionAn innovative automatic segmentation model is developed for MGs in infrared eyelid images, using scribble annotation for training. This model maintains an exceptionally high level of segmentation accuracy while substantially reducing training costs. It holds substantial utility for calculating clinical parameters, thereby greatly enhancing the diagnostic efficiency of ophthalmologists in evaluating meibomian gland dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.