Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721491›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2024

Masking for COVID-19 and other respiratory viral infections: implications of the available evidence.

Daniel T Halperin, Shira Doron, Stephen Hodgins, Robert C Bailey, Stefan Baral, Rajiv Bhatia, Jeanne Noble, Monica Gandhi, Norman Hearst

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel T HalperinDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Shira DoronDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-0857
Stephen HodginsSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-3311
Robert C BaileyDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
Stefan BaralDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5482-2419
Rajiv BhatiaDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jeanne NobleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4544-6510
Monica GandhiDivision of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Norman HearstDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of face masks has been widely promoted and at times mandated to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The 2023 publication of an updated Cochrane review on mask effectiveness for respiratory viruses as well as the unfolding epidemiology of COVID-19 underscore the need for an unbiased assessment of the current scientific evidence. It appears that the widespread promotion, adoption, and mandating of masking for COVID-19 were based not primarily on the strength of evidence for effectiveness but more on the imperative of decision-makers to act in the face of a novel public health emergency, with seemingly few good alternatives. Randomized clinical trials of masking for prevention of COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses have so far shown no evidence of benefit (with the possible exception of continuous use of N95 respirators by hospital workers). Observational studies provide lower-quality evidence and do not convincingly demonstrate benefit from masking or mask mandates. Unless robust new evidence emerges showing the effectiveness of masks in reducing infection or transmission risks in either trials or real-world conditions, mandates are not warranted for future epidemics of respiratory viral infections.

Identifiers

PMID38721491
PMCPMC11077603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.