Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721483›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2024

Nurturing families: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a whole-family intervention with vulnerable families in Jordan.

Felicity L Brown, Hind Yousef, Alexandra C E Bleile, Hadeel Mansour, Anna Barrett, Maha Ghatasheh, Eve S Puffer, Zeinab Mansour, Karam Hayef, Samer Kurdi and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Applying systems theory to global mental health.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Felicity L BrownResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6800-1657
Hind YousefResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amman, Jordan.
Alexandra C E BleileResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hadeel MansourResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amman, Jordan.
Anna BarrettResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maha GhatashehResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amman, Jordan.
Eve S PufferDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-821X
Zeinab MansourResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amman, Jordan.
Karam HayefCollateral Repair Project, Amman, Jordan.
Samer KurdiCollateral Repair Project, Amman, Jordan.
Qaasim AliCollateral Repair Project, Amman, Jordan.
Wietse A TolSection of Global Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Aala El-KhaniDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rachel CalamDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Hana Abu HassanUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mark J D JordansResearch and Development Department, War Child Alliance, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-8039

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Armed conflict and forced displacement can significantly strain nurturing family environments, which are essential for child well-being. Yet, limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of family-systemic interventions in these contexts. We conducted a two-arm, single-masked, feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (fRCT) of a whole-family intervention with Syrian, Iraqi and Jordanian families in Jordan. We aimed to determine the feasibility of intervention and study procedures to inform a fully-powered RCT. Eligible families were randomised to receive the Nurturing Families intervention or enhanced usual care (1:1). Masked assessors measured outcomes at baseline and endline; primary outcome measures were caregiver psychological distress, family functioning, and parenting practices. Families and implementing staff participated in qualitative interviews at endline. Of the 62 families screened, 60 (98%) were eligible, 97% completed the baseline and 90% completed the endline. Qualitative feedback indicated specific improvements in adolescent well-being, caregiver distress and parenting, and family relationships. Data highlighted high participant engagement and adequate facilitator fidelity and competence. Outcome measures had good psychometric properties (most α > 0.80) and sensitivity to change, with significant changes seen on most measures in the intervention but not control group. Findings indicate the acceptability and feasibility of intervention and study procedures. Subsequent full-scale evaluation is needed to determine effectiveness.

Indexed as

family interventionsJordanmental healthpilot randomised controlled trialrefugee

Identifiers

PMID38721483
PMCPMC11076925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.