ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2024
A brief physiology and pathophysiology of the bladder.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bladder Digital Twins for Neuromodulation: Current Platforms and a Roadmap to Closed-Loop Therapy.International neurourology journal · 2026Article
- Treatment of interstitial cystitis with intravesical instillation of recombinant human collagen type Ⅲ.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Improvement of Bladder Dysfunction byPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Coexistence of Pelvic Pain, Bladder, and Bowel Symptoms in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: The Effect of Transvaginal Surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Urinary incontinence in Ugandan gynecologic outpatient clinics: Prevalence, clinical types, and associated factors.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The remit of this review is confined to experimental works and publications relevant to the integral theory of female urinary incontinence (IT). Since its first publication in 1990, the IT has challenged the general view that the pathogenesis of overactive bladder (OAB) (urge, frequency, nocturia) is unknown and there is no cure. According to the IT, normal function bladder control is binary, either closed or open. Control is cortical via a peripheral feedback component: oppositely acting reflex striated pelvic muscles contract against suspensory ligaments to close the urethra for continence, open it prior to evacuation, and stretch the vagina like a trampoline to prevent excess impulses from the urothelial stretch receptors which may cause unwanted urgency at low bladder volumes (OAB). The pathogenesis of female urinary incontinence is from outside the bladder, mainly weak ligaments or vagina, due to collagen deficiency. Damage in childbirth (collagen depolymerization) and age (collagen loss) make ligaments vulnerable to damage. With weak ligaments, muscles contracting against them weaken: the muscles cannot close the urethra (manifested as stress incontinence), open it (manifested as emptying problems or retention) or stretch the vagina to prevent the urothelial stretch receptors firing off prematurely (manifested as urge incontinence). Weak pubourethral ligaments can cause stress urinary incontinence (SUI), or SUI plus urge (mixed incontinence). Weak uterosacral ligaments (USLs) can cause urge, frequency, nocturia and emptying difficulties. Treatment consisting of surgical/non-surgical strengthening of ligaments can cure or improve SUI, OAB, and emptying dysfunctions. In summary, bladder control is from outside the bladder, binary, with cortical and peripheral components. A small change in definition, from "overactive" to "overactivated" is consistent with this concept, retains the acronym "OAB", and opens the door to probability of cure and a massive increase in research endeavours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.