ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2024
Simulated operations (SOs) apply mechanical support to structures to confirm symptom causation.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coexistence of Pelvic Pain, Bladder, and Bowel Symptoms in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: The Effect of Transvaginal Surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- A New Frontier in Targeted Therapies: Harnessing PROTACs and Advanced Delivery Systems.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2024Article
- Cough-Induced Detrusor Overactivity-Outcome after Conservative and Surgical Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simulated operations (SOs) are a direct application of the Integral Theory (IT) mantras, "structure and function are related" and "restore the structure and you will improve the function". SOs performed in a clinic setting, are the most effective way possible to test the validity of the IT predictions: stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urge are mainly caused by laxity in the vagina or its supporting ligaments. The SUI prediction of the IT is validated if a hemostat applied vaginally in the position of the midurethra to mechanically support the pubourethral ligament (PUL) immediately stops urine loss on coughing. The urge and chronic pelvic pain (CPP) predictions of the IT are similarly validated if a patient states her urge and pain symptoms are relieved by insertion of the bottom blade of a bivalve speculum which supports the uterosacral ligaments (USLs). An important use of SOs is to preoperatively assess (by the hemostat test) whether sling surgery for SUI is likely to cure the patient. Similarly, the speculum is very useful for diagnosing whether severe urge or pain symptoms in a woman with minimal prolapse are originating from weak USLs. If digital support of a cystocele relieves urge symptoms, the patient can reasonably be informed that a cystocele repair should improve the urge as well her cystocele prolapse. Used intraoperatively under spinal anesthesia, SOs can determine whether a sling is sufficiently tight to reverse the loose PUL which is causing the SUI. Approximating both cardinal ligaments (CLs) intraoperatively can result in a remarkable disappearance of a transverese defect cystocele; approximating USLs intraoperatively can give an indication of how effective a USL plication would be surgically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.