Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721410›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024

Paediatric antibiotic prescribing in a nationwide direct-to-consumer telemedicine platform in France, 2018-2021.

Bénédicte Melot, Elise Launay, Florian Drouet, Julie Salomon, Julie Toubiana, Julien Grosjean, Catherine Duclos, Jérémie F Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bénédicte MelotSorbonne University Paris Nord, Laboratory of Medical Informatics and Knowledge Engineering in e-Health, LIMICS, Sorbonne University, INSERM, Bobigny, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7533-3924
Elise LaunayDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Florian DrouetQare, Medical Team, Paris, France.
Julie SalomonQare, Medical Team, Paris, France.
Julie ToubianaDepartment of General Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9561-669X
Julien GrosjeanSorbonne University Paris Nord, Laboratory of Medical Informatics and Knowledge Engineering in e-Health, LIMICS, Sorbonne University, INSERM, Bobigny, France.
Catherine DuclosSorbonne University Paris Nord, Laboratory of Medical Informatics and Knowledge Engineering in e-Health, LIMICS, Sorbonne University, INSERM, Bobigny, France.
Jérémie F CohenDepartment of General Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-8985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent regulatory and reimbursement changes facilitated the development of teleconsultation within primary care. French guidance advises against antibiotic prescribing in children in teleconsultation. We assessed paediatric antibiotic prescribing on a French teleconsultation platform. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study analysed paediatric (0-14 years) visits on a national direct-to-consumer teleconsultation platform between January 2018 and December 2021. Teleconsultations with complete information regarding diagnosis (ICD-10 coding) and prescriptions were included. We assessed antibiotic prescription rates per 100 visits across diagnoses and used logistic regression to identify factors associated with antibiotic prescribing. Results: In the 37 587 included paediatric teleconsultations (median age 3 years) performed by 713 general practitioners (GPs) and 89 paediatricians, antibiotics were prescribed for 12.1%. Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) accounted for 49.5% of antibiotic prescriptions. Antibiotic prescription rates per 100 visits were: sinusitis, 69.5%; urinary tract infections, 62.2%; pharyngitis, 59.0%; pneumonia, 45.5%; otitis, 46.6%; bronchitis, 19.6%; rhinitis, 11.6%; bronchiolitis 6.6%. Antibiotic prescription rates were higher in GPs than paediatricians [OR 2.21 (IC95% 2.07-2.35)], among physicians aged 45-54 and over 65 [OR 1.66 (1.48-1.85) and 1.48 (1.32-1.66), respectively], in female practitioners [OR 1.13 (1.05-1.21)], in children 3-6 years old [OR 1.41 (1.28-1.56)] and over 6 [OR 1.50 (1.35-1.66)], during winter [OR 1.28 (1.21-1.37)] and for RTIs [OR 1.99 (1.87-2.10)]. Antibiotic prescription rates were lower in doctors with extensive experience in teleconsultation [OR 0.92 (0.86-0.98)]. Conclusions: Despite current recommendations, paediatric patients were frequently prescribed antibiotics during acute care teleconsultations. Specific antibiotic stewardship campaigns should target paediatric teleconsultations.

Identifiers

PMID38721410
PMCPMC11077066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.