ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024
Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy with video telescopic operating microscope (VITOM) telescope: outcome analysis.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Trends in the Management of Varicocele.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional techniques of varicocele repair are associated with substantial risks of hydrocele formation, ligation of the testicular artery, and varicocele recurrence. The advantages of the microscopic approach to varicocele repairs are detailed identification and preservation of the vascular structures. In this study, our purpose is to review the outcome of all patients that underwent microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy with the video telescopic operating microscope (VITOM). Hence, a retrospective review of 23 varicocele patients who underwent microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy at the center from the year 2019 until 2021 was done. They, ranging between 18 to 58 years of age, comprising one case of right varicocele, fifteen cases of left varicocele, and seven cases of bilateral varicocele, were all having symptoms (pain and swelling) and clinically palpable varicocele. Ultrasounds were done to confirm the diagnosis and measure the testicular size. The surgery was performed by a single surgeon, under spinal anesthesia. The operation was performed using the VITOM telescope system, with an average operative time of one hour. The patients were followed-up at one month postoperatively to review the wound and symptoms. Phone call evaluations of all 23 patients were done to detect any recurrence or complications. All patients were discharged one day after surgery. Post-operative, all of them have a well-formed scar at the previous subinguinal region incision wound during the clinic visits. None of the 23 patients reported with varicocele recurrence, testicular pain, hydrocele formation or sexual dysfunction. The previous testicular pain or discomfort they encountered prior to the surgery was resolved as well. In conclusion, microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy using the VITOM telescope is feasible and could achieve good outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.