ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2024
Expanding RNA editing toolkit using an IDR-based strategy.
Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Manual for Genome and Transcriptome Engineering.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA base editors should ideally be free of immunogenicity, compact, efficient, and specific, which has not been achieved for C > U editing. Here we first describe a compact C > U editor entirely of human origin, created by fusing the human C > U editing enzyme RESCUE-S to Cas inspired RNA targeting system (CIRTS), a tiny, human-originated programmable RNA-binding domain. This editor, CIRTS-RESCUEv1 (V1), was inefficient. Remarkably, a short histidine-rich domain (HRD), which is derived from the internal disordered region (IDR) in the human CYCT1, a protein capable of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), enhanced V1 editing at on-targets as well as off-targets, the latter effect being minor. The V1-HRD fusion protein formed puncta characteristic of LLPS, and various other IDRs (but not an LLPS-impaired mutant) could replace HRD to effectively induce puncta and potentiate V1, suggesting that the diverse domains acted via a common, LLPS-based mechanism. Importantly, the HRD fusion strategy was applicable to various other types of C > U RNA editors. Our study expands the RNA editing toolbox and showcases a general method for stimulating C > U RNA base editors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.