ArticleBiodiversity data journal2024
Audio tagging of avian dawn chorus recordings in California, Oregon and Washington.
Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A bird species occurrence dataset from passive audio recordings across dense urban areas in Gothenburg, Sweden.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Declines in biodiversity and ecosystem health due to climate change are raising urgent concerns. In response, large-scale multispecies monitoring programmes are being implemented that increasingly adopt sensor-based approaches such as acoustic recording. These approaches rely heavily on ecological data science. However, developing reliable algorithms for processing sensor-based data relies heavily on labelled datasets of sufficient quality and quantity. We present a dataset of 1,575 dawn chorus soundscape recordings, 141 being fully annotated (n = 32,994 annotations) with avian, mammalian and amphibian vocalisations. The remaining recordings were included to facilitate novel research applications. These recordings are paired with 48 site-level climatic, forest structure and topographic covariates. This dataset provides a valuable resource to researchers developing acoustic classification algorithms or studying biodiversity and wildlife behaviour and its relationship to environmental gradients. The dawn chorus recordings were collected as part of a long-term Northern Spotted Owl monitoring program; this demonstrates the complementary value of harnessing existing monitoring efforts to strengthen biodiversity sampling. New information: This dataset of dawn chorus soundscape recordings is one of the few open-access acoustic datasets annotated with non-biotic and both interspecific (across species) and intraspecific (within species) bird, mammal and amphibian sonotypes and the first that is paired with climatic, forest structure and topographical covariates extracted at recorder locations. This makes it a valuable resource for researchers studying the dawn chorus and its relationship to the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.