ArticleBrain & spine2024
Adherence to international guidelines in neurocritical care of cervical traumatic spinal cord injury-a retrospective study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of blood pressure threshold on adverse outcomes in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Mean Arterial Pressure Augmentation for Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neurological Recovery and Mortality.Global spine journal · 2026Review
- Advances and New Therapies in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Traumatic central cord Syndrome: An integrated neurosurgical and neurocritical care perspective.Brain & spine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The American Association of Neurologic Surgeons guidelines on the management of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), updated in 2013, focus on spinal cord perfusion, early decompressive surgery, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis to improve neurological outcome. Research question: How neurocritical care and initial management have changed with the implementation of updated management guidelines, focusing on guidelines adherence and neurological outcome. Material and methods: Systemic physiological variables, time to neurosurgical treatment and VTE prophylaxis, and neurological outcome, were retrospectively collected from adult patients treated for cervical SCI 2001-2021. Results: Fifty-two patients were included. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was significantly higher after 2013 (86±9.9 mmHg) when compared to before 2013 (79±9.9 mmHg), p = 0.041. Median time to surgery was 41 h before, and 20 h after 2013 (p = 0.029). Time to VTE prophylaxis was six days before and four days after 2013. Most neurocritical care complications were less commonly observed after 2013. Despite improved adherence to treatment goals, 44 % of MAP levels were below target, and 33% of patients were operated beyond 24h post-injury. Neurological outcome was not improved after implementation of the revised guidelines. Discussion and conclusion: While implementation of the revised 2013 guidelines improved most aspects of the acute SCI management, many guideline targets were not met in a large subset of patients. Strict adherence to the acute neurocritical management goals, and early surgical treatment, is likely crucial when aiming to improve SCI outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.