Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721245›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research

"Interprofessional Collaboration" among Pharmacists, Physicians, and Nurses: A Hybrid Concept Analysis.

Faeze Kobrai-Abkenar, Sanaz Salimi, Parand Pourghane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Faeze Kobrai-AbkenarDepartment of Nursing Zaynab (P.B.U.H), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Sanaz SalimiClinical Pharmacy Resident of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Parand PourghaneDepartment of Nursing Zaynab (P.B.U.H), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: "Interprofessional Collaboration" is associated with improving the quality of care. The objective of this study was the analysis of the concept of "Interprofessional Collaboration" using a hybrid model. Materials and Methods: A hybrid model was used in order to analyze the concept of "Interprofessional Collaboration." The first phase was the scientific search of texts in all valid electronic databases. The second phase includes fieldwork in which medical, pharmaceutical, and nursing staff were interviewed. Data were collected, reviewed, and analyzed in the third phase. Results: The four main themes extracted in the theoretical phase included: "attributes of individual, team, organizational, and system." In the fieldwork phase, three themes and seven sub-themes were identified: "Dynamism/effectiveness of collaboration, uncertain boundaries of collaboration, advanced organizational culture." In the final phase, with the combination of the results of two previous phases, the final definition of the concept was presented: "A process that brings together systems, organizations and individuals from various professions to achieve common interests and goals. Achieving common goals and interests is influenced by individual, team, organizational, and system attributes." Conclusions: Defining the concept of interprofessional collaboration and identifying its various aspects can be a practical guide for creating and evaluating it in educational and clinical settings.

Indexed as

Collaborationconcept analysisnursespharmacistsphysicians

Identifiers

PMID38721245
PMCPMC11075915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.