ArticleCureus2024
Radiological Insights From Two Distinct Cases of Pineal Region Meningioma: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report delineates the radiological evaluation and diagnostic intricacies of two unique cases of pineal region meningioma, underscoring the pivotal role of advanced imaging techniques in the accurate diagnosis and management of such rare tumors. Pineal region tumors represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, with meningiomas in this location being particularly uncommon, thereby posing significant challenges in diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making. The first case involves a 40-year-old female presenting with progressive headaches and visual disturbances with symptoms of increased intracranial pressure, whereas the second case describes a 30-year-old male presenting with headache, dizziness, difficulty with balance, and cognitive decline. Both patients underwent a comprehensive diagnostic workup, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which revealed tumors in the pineal region exhibiting characteristics suggestive of meningioma. The MRI findings in both cases included well-defined mass lesions showing iso- to hypointense signal on T1-weighted images with robust contrast enhancement. Additionally, the radiological assessment was instrumental in differentiating these meningiomas from other pineal region tumors, such as germinomas or pineocytomas, based on their distinctive imaging features and the absence of dissemination. Surgical resection followed by histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of meningioma in both cases. This report highlights the critical role of radiological imaging in the early detection and differentiation of pineal region tumors, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach to achieve optimal patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.