ArticleCureus2024
Effect of Early Cyclosporine Treatment on Survival in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Feline immune-mediated skin disorders: Part 2.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- D-Penicillamine-Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in a Patient with Gold Cyanide Intoxication: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly cyclosporine administration is a potentially useful treatment in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). However, previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the survival benefits. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the survival of patients with SJS/TEN according to whether they received early cyclosporine administration.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted using a Japanese national administrative claims database. Data on patients admitted to the hospital with SJS/TEN between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2021, were extracted. Patients with missing data, those discharged within two days of admission, pregnant women, and children aged <16 years were excluded. Patients who received cyclosporine on the day of admission (early cyclosporine group) were compared with those who did not (comparison group). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were 30- and 50-day mortality and length of hospital stay. The effect of early cyclosporine treatment was evaluated after baseline adjustment using doubly robust estimation.
resultsAmong 3807 enrolled patients (mean age, 65.5 years; 53.8% women), the early cyclosporine and comparison groups included 115 and 3692 patients, respectively. After adjustment, cyclosporine treatment decreased in-hospital mortality by 6.03% (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.27-6.82%), 30-day mortality by 2.94% (95% CI, 2.43-3.50%), and 50-day mortality by 4.38% (95% CI, 3.70-5.04%), but increased the length of hospital stay by 9.45 days (95% CI, 1.00-20.23 days).
conclusionEarly cyclosporine administration can improve the survival of patients with SJS/TEN but is associated with a longer hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.