ArticleCureus2024
Electrocautery-Assisted Management of Unilateral Pyogenic Granuloma: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epulis: A Narrative Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Features, Pathogenesis, and Management.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2025Review
- Electrocautery-Assisted Management of Aberrant Frena Causing Midline Diastema: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyogenic granuloma (PG) refers to an acquired benign proliferation most commonly seen within the oral cavity involving lips, palate, and gingiva. The term is misleading since it is a type of lobular capillary haemangioma but not an infection. It frequently recurs but lacks the capacity for malignant alteration. Depending on where the PG is located, one may experience discomfort or irritation. PGs often lead to differential diagnoses by clinicians, which include capillary hemangioma, neurofibroma, melanoma, and hyperplasia. Therefore, one must confirm a PG by diagnosing and analysing it by clinical and histopathological examinations, and treatment options should be formulated according to the evaluation. Sometimes, a biopsy of the lesion can be taken for final diagnosis. Various treatment approaches are available, including conventional scalpel excision, laser, electrocautery, and cryotherapy. Surgical excision is preferable due to the likelihood of malignancy, as it provides the best cosmetic appearance and produces a specimen for pathologic assessment. After confirming all the clinical evaluatory parameters and routine haematological examinations, which proved satisfactory and within normal ranges, this case of a 45-year-old female with soft tissue growth of the gingival origin was managed by electrocautery, and the PG was confirmed by a clinical-histopathological examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.