Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721129›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Biogeographical ‍distributions of trickster animals.

Shota Shibasaki, Ryosuke Nakadai, Yo Nakawake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shota ShibasakiDepartment of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, 27412, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8196-0745
Ryosuke NakadaiBiodiversity Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9512-8511
Yo NakawakeDepartment of Social Psychology, Yasuda Women's University, Asaminami-ku, Hiroshima, 731-0153, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4911-0740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human language encompasses almost endless potential for meaning, and folklore can theoretically incorporate themes beyond time and space. However, actual distributions of the themes are not always universal and their constraints remain unclear. Here, we specifically focused on zoological folklore and aimed to reveal what restricts the distribution of trickster animals in folklore. We applied the biogeographical methodology to 16 taxonomic categories of trickster (455 data) and real (93 090 848 data) animals obtained from large databases. Our analysis revealed that the distribution of trickster animals was restricted by their presence in the vicinity and, more importantly, the presence of their corresponding real animals. Given that the distributions of real animals are restricted by the annual mean temperature and annual precipitation, these climatic conditions indirectly affect the distribution of trickster animals. Our study, applying biogeographical methods to culture, paves the way to a deeper understanding of the interactions between ecology and culture.

Indexed as

biomecultural evolutionecological constraintsfolklorespecies distribution

Identifiers

PMID38721129
PMCPMC11076115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.