Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721106›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2024

Translation and Pilot Validation of Hindi, Marathi, and Bangla Translation of Quality-of-Life EORTC Radiation Proctitis Module (PRT-20) for Routine Clinical Use.

Revathy Krishnamurthy, Rahul Krishnatry, Devankshi Rane, Purva Pawar, Debanjan Chakraborty, Utpal Gaikwad, Suman Ghosh, Aasma Siddiqui, Debanjali Datta, Akanksha Anup and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Revathy KrishnamurthyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Rahul KrishnatryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4511-7782
Devankshi RaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Purva PawarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Debanjan ChakrabortyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Utpal GaikwadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Krupamayi Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Suman GhoshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Aasma SiddiquiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Debanjali DattaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Akanksha AnupDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sayan DasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medica Superspeciality Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Shivakumar GudiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Reena EngineerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3893-1287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rahul Krishnatry The aim of this study was to translate and validate the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) "Radiation Proctitis" (PRT-20) module in Hindi, Marathi, and Bangla languages. The EORTC PRT-20 was translated into Hindi, Marathi, and Bangla using EORTC guidelines. Two separate translators first translated the original questionnaire into the three regional languages, following which a reconciled forward translation was compiled. This reconciled version in each language was then back-translated into English by two other translators. This back-translated version was then compared with the original the EORTC questionnaire for correctness, and the preliminary questionnaires were formed in all three languages. The EORTC translation unit approved the questionnaires. The preliminary questionnaires were administered to 30 patients (10 for each language) diagnosed with rectal or anal canal cancer who had received pelvic radiotherapy and were at risk of developing PRT. None of the patients had seen the questionnaire before. After filling out the questionnaire, each patient was interviewed for difficulty in answering, confusion, understanding, or if any of the questions were upsetting and if patients would have asked the question differently. No changes were suggested for Marathi and Bangla translations. Two modifications were suggested in the Hindi translation, which was then retested in five patients and finalized. All the suggestions were incorporated into the preliminary questionnaires, which were sent back to the EORTC for final approval. After reviewing the entire report of pilot testing for the translated quality-of-life questionaire-PRT-20 in three languages, it was approved by the EORTC translation unit. The translated questionnaires were reliable, with Cronbach

Indexed as

EORTCPRT-20quality-of-life questionnaireradiation proctitisrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID38721106
PMCPMC11076072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.