Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38721102›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2024

Neuralink and Brain-Computer Interface-Exciting Times for Artificial Intelligence.

Purvish Mahendra Parikh, Ajit Venniyoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Purvish Mahendra ParikhDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Sitapur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Ajit VenniyoorNational Oncology Centre, The Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0000-0002-7339-9388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purvish Mahendra ParikhBrain-computer interfaces are becoming a tangible reality, capable of significantly aiding patients in real-world scenarios. The recent approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for clinical human trials of Neuralink marks a monumental stride, comparable to Mr. Armstrong's moonwalk. Numerous other companies are also pioneering innovative solutions in this domain. Presently, over 150,000 patients in the United States possess brain implants. As technology advances, it holds the potential to alleviate various conditions, notably motor paralysis, cerebral palsy, and involuntary movements.

Indexed as

BCIhuman trialsimplantmotor paralysisoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID38721102
PMCPMC11076062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.