ArticleJMA journal2024
A Checklist Confirming Whether a Manuscript for Submission Adheres to the Fundamentals of Academic Writing: A Proposal.
Article in JMA journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Educator's Blueprint: Seven Strategies for Turning Peer Review Into Scholarly Growth.AEM education and training · 2026Article
- Article
- Reviewer's dilemma when facing a 'voluminous' manuscript.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Humans-written versus ChatGPT-generated abstracts: beyond the discussion on "who wrote it".Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Embracing Letters to the Editor: Classifying Types of Letters into Disagreement, Agreement, and Complementary.JMA journal · 2024Article
- Welcoming the JMA Journal's Call for Manuscripts on Medical Artificial Intelligence.JMA journal · 2024Article
- Comparing ChatGPT's ability to write and review papers: then what?Croatian medical journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Crafting Informative Titles in Medical Articles to Enhance the Comprehension of the Study Findings.JMA journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A manuscript written not adhering to the fundamentals of academic writing (so-called paper-writing rules) may be rejected before the significance of the study is recognized. Submitting authors, especially those with little experience, may neglect such fundamentals. A simple checklist, which would enable the authors to check whether a manuscript for submission adheres to such fundamentals, should appear at the beginning of the Author Guidelines of medical journal. This checklist may contribute to writing a manuscript following the fundamentals of academic writing, thereby preventing rejection based solely on the writing style.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.