ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2024
Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: a simulation modeling study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Economic evaluations of screening and case-finding for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): a systematic review.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Application of Discrete Event Simulation Models for COPD Management: A Systematic Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of FEVChronic respiratory diseasePooled it
- Impact of the Population Medicine Multimorbidity Intervention in Xishui County (POPMIX) on People at High Risk for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Who Experience Mental Health Symptoms: Protocol for the POPMIX-MH Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Trial
- Impact of the Population Medicine Multimorbidity Intervention in Xishui County (POPMIX) on People at High Risk for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for the POPMIX-COPD Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Trial
- Reliability and usability of a portable spirometer compared to a laboratory spirometer.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Trial
- Improving case-finding of long-term health problems in disadvantaged communities: A Policy-focused Evidence Brief.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- A cough sound-based deep learning algorithm for accessible prompt detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with smartphones.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- High-intensity interval training alleviates COPD-induced gastrocnemius muscle dysfunction via the BRD4/PGC-1α axis through restoring mitochondrial function and oxidative fiber composition.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2026Article
- Integrating Disease Burden and Cost-Effectiveness for Value-Based Prioritisation of COPD Interventions: A Narrative Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
- Body composition in stable COPD: associations with disease severity and early sarcopenia prediction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Divergent Trajectories and Risk Factor Attribution of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Burden in China and the United States, 1990-2023: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis with Projections to 2035 Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Investing in Primary Care to Reduce the Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.China CDC weekly · 2025Article
- The impact of adherence on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness: A modeling study.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Treatment needs in mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evidence from longitudinal studies.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Contemporary Concise Review 2024: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025Review
- Cost-effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population screening in China: based on individual data from WHO Collaborating Centre-initiated 'Enjoying Breathing Program'.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Treatment patterns for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease under the tiered medical system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Spirometry-Defined Small Airway Dysfunction in the High-Risk Population for COPD in Yunnan Province, China: A Population Based Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: China has the highest disease burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the world; however, the diagnosis rate remains low. Screening for COPD in the population may improve early diagnosis and long-term health outcomes for patients with COPD. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of population-based COPD screening policies in China. Methods: We developed a microsimulation model that simulated incidence, natural history, and clinical management of COPD over a lifetime horizon among the general population aged 35-80 years in China. We evaluated population-based screening policies with different screening methods (one-step with COPD Screening Questionnaire or two-step with additional portable spirometer test) and frequencies (one-time or every 1-10 years). We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the screening policies compared with the status quo (without screening) and identified the most cost-effective screening policy. Scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of key parameters and the robustness of model results. Findings: Compared with the status quo, all population-based COPD screening policies were cost-effective with estimated ICERs ranging between $8034 and $13,209 per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY), all under the willingness-to-pay value of $38,441/QALY (three times China's gross domestic product per capita). A total of 0.39%-8.10% of COPD-related deaths and 0.58%-2.70% of COPD exacerbations were projected to be averted by COPD screening. Among all screening policies, annual two-step screening was the most cost-effective. Improving the linkage from screening to diagnosis and treatment could further increase population health benefits and the cost-effectiveness of COPD screening. Interpretation: Population-based screening for COPD could be cost-effective in China. Offering public programs for COPD screening similar to existing preventive health services for other chronic diseases could be a promising strategy to improve population health outcomes and mitigate the disease burden of COPD in China. Funding: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Science, Chinese Academy of Engineering project, and Horizon Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.