ArticleIDCases2024
A rare skin reaction in an elderly woman after exposure to prophylaxis for rabies: A case report.
Article in IDCases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rabies is a zoonosis caused by viruses of the family Rhabdoviridae. Prophylaxis with the rabies vaccine and immunoglobulins, depending on the severity of the case, is recommended. After vaccination, mild, moderate, or severe adverse events (AE) are described. Although rare, severe skin reactions may occur, increasing the risk of anaphylaxis. Case report: An 84-year-old woman was attacked by a stray unknown cat, leaving her with bites and scratches in the neck region and multiple injuries. The case was classified as severe. About 3 h after the first dose of the rabies vaccine, disseminated purplish spots appeared on her lower limbs, worsening significantly after the second dose, requiring hospitalization for the application of the third dose under observation, dermatology evaluation, and collection of skin tissue for biopsy. She was discharged 24 h after the third vaccination, and the purple spots cleared gradually. The biopsy suggested an adverse reaction to the vaccine components. Immunohistochemistry of the rabies virus antigen in dermal nerve fillets was negative. The seroconversion post rabies vaccine showed IgG antibody values below the reference levels. Conclusion: Vaccination against rabies is extremely important; however, AEs may occur. Our patient developed an important AE and required hospitalization. After complete vaccination, the serum was not converted. A similar case was not previously described, and the case report is important for the creation of jurisprudence on rabies vaccination in elderly patients in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.