ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Safety and feasibility of chemotherapy followed by liver transplantation for patients with definitely unresectable colorectal liver metastases: insights from the TransMet randomised clinical trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02597348 (Curative Potential of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Definitively Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Curative Potential of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Definitively Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases (CLM) Treated by Chemotherapy: a Prospective Multicentric Randomized Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oncologic Outcomes After Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Proportions.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in liver transplantation for hepatic malignancies.Hepatic oncology · 2026Review
- A dual-site oral nanovaccine programs anti-colorectal tumor immunity from small intestinal priming to large intestinal boosting.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Liver transplantation as a new treatment option for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal liver metastases: a review.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- The State of the Art on Management of Patients with Unresectable Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Transplant Oncology-A New Frontier in Liver Cancer Care.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- [Frozen sections in hepatobiliary surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Article
- Moving towards more personalized approaches in locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
- Liver transplantation for colorectal cancer with liver metastases.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Molecular characterization of the histopathological growth patterns of colorectal cancer liver metastases by RNA sequencing of targeted samples at the tumor-liver interface.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024Article
- Translating efficacy of liver transplantation in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer into clinical practice: the TransMet trial.ESMO open · 2024Article
- The Role of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound as a Local Consolidative Therapy in Multimodal Conversion Treatment for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Case Series.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the increasing efficacy of chemotherapy (C), the 5-year survival rate for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) remains around 10%. Liver transplantation (LT) might offer a curative approach for patients with liver-only disease, yet its superior efficacy compared to C alone remains to be demonstrated. Methods: The TransMet randomised multicentre clinical trial (NCT02597348) compares the curative potential of C followed by LT versus C alone in patients with unresectable CLM despite stable or responding disease on C. Patient eligibility criteria proposed by local tumour boards had to be validated by an independent committee via monthly videoconferences. Outcomes reported here are from a non-specified interim analysis. These include the eligibility of patients to be transplanted for non resectable colorectal liver metastases, as well as the feasibility and the safety of liver transplantation in this indication. Findings: From February 2016 to July 2021, 94 (60%) of 157 patients from 20 centres in 3 countries submitted to the validation committee, were randomised. Reasons for ineligibility were mainly tumour progression in 50 (32%) or potential resectability in 13 (8%). The median delay to LT after randomisation was 51 (IQR 30-65) days. Nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI: 9-33) allocated to the LT arm failed to undergo transplantation because of intercurrent disease progression. Three of the 38 transplanted patients (8%) were re-transplanted, one of whom (3%) died post-operatively from multi-organ failure. Interpretation: The selection process of potential candidates for curative intent LT for unresectable CLM in the TransMet trial highlighted the critical role of an independent multidisciplinary validation committee. After stringent selection, the feasibility of LT was 81%, as 19% had disease progression while on the waiting list. These patients should be given high priority for organ allocation to avoid dropout from the transplant strategy. Funding: No source of support or funding from any author to disclose for this work. The trial was supported by the Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.