ArticleAJOG global reports2024
Risk factors for postoperative recurrence of cesarean scar endometriosis.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal Wall Endometriosis Following Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical differences between adipose- and muscle-layer cesarean scar endometriosis: A retrospective observational study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Observational
- Insights Into the Clinical Features, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Post-Surgical Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Surgical Reconstruction of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis Post-Cesarean Section: A Monocentric Experience of a Rare Pathology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing global prevalence of cesarean scar endometriosis necessitates a thorough understanding of the risk factors for postoperative recurrence, as this is crucial for developing preventive strategies and informed decision-making.
objectiveTo obtain insight into the clinical risk factors for postoperative recurrence of cesarean scar endometriosis following open lesion resection. STUDY
designThe cohort for this study comprised 272 women, including 26 patients with postoperative recurrence and 246 without recurrence. Various parameters, including baseline characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative conditions, and follow-up information, were analyzed. A comparison of these parameters was made between patients with and without postoperative recurrence. Time-to-recurrence analyses were conducted using Cox's univariate and multivariate proportional hazard analyses, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test.
resultsThe results revealed significant differences between patients with and without postoperative recurrence in terms of visual analog scale for abdominal pain (
conclusionThe study highlights that the visual analog scale for abdominal pain ≥4 is a risk factor for the recurrence of cesarean scar endometriosis after open lesion resection. Furthermore, the surgical method of integrated excision was identified as a protective factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.