ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024
Antimicrobial peptides in livestock: a review with a one health approach.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fungal expression strategies for heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Overcoming LPS-mediated resistance in gram-negative pathogens: a review of LL-37 analogs and computational design strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Probiotic-Derived Bacteriocins for Veterinary Biofilm Control: Mechanisms, Evidence, and One Health Translation.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- A PLUM Job: Peptide modeLs for Understanding and engineering antiMicrobial therapeutics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Use of a synthetic antimicrobial peptide (PA-13) alone or in combination with reduced gentamicin levels to controlVeterinary world · 2026Article
- Effects of cecropin A on cytokine production and tight junction protein expression in chicken ileal explant cultures.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Effects of Antimicrobial Peptides on the Growth Performance of Squabs Were Investigated Based on Microbiomics and Non-Targeted Metabolomics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Livestock Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Isolation, Genomics-Based and Biochemical Characterization of Bacteriocinogenic Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins, Sourced from the Gastrointestinal Tract of Meat-Producing Pigs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), often referred to as nature's antibiotics, are ubiquitous in living organisms, spanning from bacteria to humans. Their potency, versatility, and unique mechanisms of action have garnered significant research attention. Unlike conventional antibiotics, peptides are biodegradable, adding to their appeal as potential candidates to address bacterial resistance in livestock farming-a challenge that has been under scrutiny for decades. This issue is complex and multifactorial, influenced by a variety of components. The World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed a comprehensive approach known as One Health, emphasizing the interconnectedness of human-animal-environment relationships in tackling such challenges. This review explores the application of AMPs in livestock farming and how they can mitigate the impact of this practice within the One Health framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.