ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024
Specific Birth Defects Following Antiseizure Medications Used By Pregnant Women With Epilepsy.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Psychotropic Treatment for Pregnant Women: Efficacy, Adverse Outcomes, and Therapeutic Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Previous research has been limited in the comprehensive study of associations between the use of individual antiseizure medications (ASMs) in pregnancy and specific groups of birth defects, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the topic are limited by pooled samples and study designs. This study investigated birth defects related to ASM use in pregnancy in children born to women with epilepsy in Sweden over 20 years. Methods: We used data from Swedish national registers to follow a cohort of 17,996 children born to women diagnosed with epilepsy any time before conception in Sweden from 1996 to 2016, following them through 2017. We examined maternal-reported use of the 4 most commonly reported ASMs: lamotrigine (n = 2,148, 11.9%), carbamazepine (n = 1,940, 10.8%), valproic acid (n = 1,043, 5.80%), and levetiracetam (n = 587, 3.26%). We identified birth defects using diagnoses recorded at the time of discharge from the hospital and inpatient and outpatient diagnoses recorded in the first year of life. Models were estimated in a stepped fashion: unadjusted, adjusted for covariates, among a subcohort born to women diagnosed 10 years before conception (n = 14,586), and restricted to monotherapy. Results: Valproic acid use in pregnancy had the strongest and most widespread associations with birth defects in children, with carbamazepine also having links to several birth defects, including respiratory system and genital organ defects. Lamotrigine use in pregnancy was associated with cleft lip/palate and chromosomal abnormalities. Levetiracetam was most often used with other ASMs and preliminarily associated with many birth defects. Discussion: Our findings support avoidance of valproic acid use in pregnancy whenever possible. Lamotrigine and carbamazepine may be safer alternatives. However, these medications were also associated with certain birth defects, including some not reported previously. We are among the first to examine the possible effects of levetiracetam use in pregnancy, though more research is needed to investigate this further.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.