Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720952›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024

Inequalities in the Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer Disease.

Maurizio Giorelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maurizio GiorelliOperative Unit of Neurology, Barletta, ASL BT, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6069-7063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidence of Alzheimer disease (AD) is going to rise in the next years and to become a health and social emergency. The prevention and the therapeutic management of AD still present unmet needs worldwide. The recent approval of monoclonal antibodies against amyloid β (anti-Aβ mAbs) for AD has increased the level of uncertainty regarding on how such drugs should be administered, to whom, and for how long. Concerns about cost-effectiveness ratios of anti-Aβ mAbs and the need for actual strategies of risk prevention have further dug barriers of inequalities between the national health care systems. Planning research to address questions on the real feasibility of the correct therapeutic management, improving international cooperation on surveillance of risk factors, implementing pathways for timely diagnosis, and effective medical and social support for patients with AD worldwide would be extremely valuable to fight against this upcoming pandemic.

Identifiers

PMID38720952
PMCPMC11073886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.