Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720871›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Artificial intelligence-based classification of breast nodules: a quantitative morphological analysis of ultrasound images.

Hao Pan, Changbei Shi, Yuxing Zhang, Zijian Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao PanSchool of Electronic Information, Xijing University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4813-9709
Changbei ShiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Yuxing ZhangSchool of Electronic Information, Xijing University, Xi'an, China.
Zijian ZhongSchool of Electronic Information, Xijing University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate classification of breast nodules into benign and malignant types is critical for the successful treatment of breast cancer. Traditional methods rely on subjective interpretation, which can potentially lead to diagnostic errors. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods using the quantitative morphological analysis of ultrasound images have been explored for the automated and reliable classification of breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of AI-based approaches for improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. Methods: In this study, a quantitative analysis approach was adopted, with a focus on five critical features for evaluation: degree of boundary regularity, clarity of boundaries, echo intensity, and uniformity of echoes. Furthermore, the classification results were assessed using five machine learning methods: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), naive Bayes, and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). Based on these assessments, a multifeature combined prediction model was established. Results: We evaluated the performance of our classification model by quantifying various features of the ultrasound images and using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The moment of inertia achieved an AUC value of 0.793, while the variance and mean of breast nodule areas achieved AUC values of 0.725 and 0.772, respectively. The convexity and concavity achieved AUC values of 0.988 and 0.987, respectively. Additionally, we conducted a joint analysis of multiple features after normalization, achieving a recall value of 0.98, which surpasses most medical evaluation indexes on the market. To ensure experimental rigor, we conducted cross-validation experiments, which yielded no significant differences among the classifiers under 5-, 8-, and 10-fold cross-validation (P>0.05). Conclusions: The quantitative analysis can accurately differentiate between benign and malignant breast nodules.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)breast ultrasoundmachine learningQuantitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID38720871
PMCPMC11074741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.