Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720867›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Deep-learning-based reconstruction of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate accelerated by compressed sensing provides improved image quality at half the acquisition time.

Martin Jurka, Iva Macova, Monika Wagnerova, Otakar Capoun, Roman Jakubicek, Petr Ourednicek, Lukas Lambert, Andrea Burgetova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Deep Learning-accelerated MRI in Body and Chest.Journal of computer assisted tomography
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin JurkaDepartment of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Iva MacovaDepartment of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Monika WagnerovaDepartment of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Otakar CapounDepartment of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Roman JakubicekFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr OurednicekDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Anna University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Lukas LambertDepartment of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2299-4707
Andrea BurgetovaDepartment of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9975-2338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) improves the quality of magnetic resonance (MR) images which allows faster acquisitions. The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of standard and accelerated T2 weighted turbo-spin-echo (TSE) images of the prostate reconstructed with and without DLR and to find associations between perceived image quality and calculated image characteristics. Methods: In a cohort of 47 prospectively enrolled consecutive patients referred for bi-parametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), two T2-TSE acquisitions in the transverse plane were acquired on a 3T scanner-a standard T2-TSE sequence and a short sequence accelerated by a factor of two using compressed sensing (CS). The images were reconstructed with and without DLR in super-resolution mode. The image quality was rated in six domains. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and image sharpness were measured. Results: The mean acquisition time was 281±23 s for the standard and 140±12 s for the short acquisition (P<0.0001). DLR images had higher sharpness compared to non-DLR (P<0.001). Short and short-DLR had lower SNR than the standard and standard-DLR (P<0.001). The perceived image quality of short-DLR was rated better in all categories compared to the standard sequence (P<0.001 to P=0.004). All domains of subjective evaluation were correlated with measured image sharpness (P<0.001). Conclusions: T2-TSE acquisition of the prostate accelerated using CS combined with DLR reconstruction provides images with increased sharpness that have a superior quality as perceived by human readers compared to standard T2-TSE. The perceived image quality is correlated with measured image contrast.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)image reconstructionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID38720867
PMCPMC11074762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.