Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720859›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Deep learning image reconstruction of diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluation of prostate cancer focusing on its clinical implications.

Juhyun Jeong, Suk Keu Yeom, In Young Choi, Sang Hoon Cha, Ji Sung Han, Chang Hee Lee, Deuk Jae Sung, Jung-Woo Choi, Jae Hyun Bae, Hangseok Choi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deep Learning-accelerated MRI in Body and Chest.Journal of computer assisted tomography
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Juhyun JeongDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5321-8161
Suk Keu YeomDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3390-9793
In Young ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5264-675X
Sang Hoon ChaDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-6804
Ji Sung HanDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Chang Hee LeeDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3381-2227
Deuk Jae SungDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-3052
Jung-Woo ChoiDepartment of Pathology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Jae Hyun BaeDepartment of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9862-3545
Hangseok ChoiBiomedical Research Center, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-8160
InSeong KimSiemens Healthcare Ltd., Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4437-8358
Thomas BenkertSiemens Healthineers GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
Elisabeth WeilandSiemens Healthineers GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-1291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Image-based assessment of prostate cancer (PCa) is increasingly emphasized in the diagnostic workflow for selecting biopsy targets and possibly predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Assessment is based on Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) which is largely dependent on T2-weighted image (T2WI) and diffusion weighted image (DWI). This study aims to determine whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can improve the image quality of DWI and affect the assessment of PI-RADS ≥4 in patients with PCa. Methods: In this retrospective study, 3.0T post-biopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 70 patients with PCa in Korea University Ansan Hospital from November 2021 to July 2022 was reconstructed with and without using DLR. Four DWI image sets were made: (I) conventional DWI (CDWI): DWI with acceleration factor 2 and conventional parallel imaging reconstruction, (II) DL1: DWI with acceleration factor 2 using DLR, (III) DL2: DWI with acceleration factor 3 using DLR, and (IV) DL3: DWI with acceleration factor 3 and half average b-value using DLR. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured by one reviewer, while two reviewers independently assessed overall image quality, noise, and lesion conspicuity using a four-point visual scoring system from each DWI image set. Two reviewers also performed PI-RADSv2.1 scoring on lesions suspected of malignancy. Results: A total of 70 patients (mean age, 70.8±9.7 years) were analyzed. The image acquisition time was 4:46 min for CDWI and DL1, 3:40 min for DL2, and 2:00 min for DL3. DL1 and DL2 images resulted in better lesion conspicuity compared to CDWI images assessed by both readers (P<0.05). DLR resulted in a significant increase in SNR, from 38.4±14.7 in CDWI to 56.9±21.0 in DL1. CNR increased from 25.1±11.5 in CDWI to 43.1±17.8 in DL1 (P<0.001). PI-RADS v2.1 scoring for PCa lesions was more agreeable with the DL1 reconstruction method than with CDWI (κ value CDWI, DL1; 0.40, 0.61, respectively). A statistically significant number of lesions were upgraded from PI-RADS <4 in CDWI image to PI-RADS ≥4 in DL1 images for both readers (P<0.05). Most of the PI-RADS upgraded lesions were from higher than unfavorable intermediate-risk groups according to the 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines with statistically significant difference of marginal probability in DL1 and DL2 for both readers (P<0.05). Conclusions: DLR in DWI for PCa can provide options for improving image quality with a significant impact on PI-RADS evaluation or about a 23% reduction in acquisition time without compromising image quality.

Indexed as

deep learning (DL)diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (diffusion MRI)Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)prostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38720859
PMCPMC11074768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.