ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Agreement of ejection fraction measured by coronary computed tomography (CT) and cardiac ultrasound in evaluating patients with chronic heart failure: an observational comparative study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calculation of Ejection Fraction Using Cardiac Computed Tomography: Clinical Evolution, Reliability, and Technological Challenges-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Cardiac Structural and Functional Evaluation Using a Heart Motion Correction Algorithm for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients With High Heart Rates.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- LncRNA SMILR Serves a Diagnostic Biomarker in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Regulates Functions of Vascular Endothelial Cells.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Article
- Integration and Potential Applications of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography in Cardio-Oncology.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac ultrasound is one of the most important examinations in cardiovascular medicine, but the technical requirements for the operator are relatively high, which to some extent affects the scope of its use. This study was dedicated to investigating the agreement of ejection fraction between coronary computed tomography (CT) and cardiac ultrasound and diagnostic performance in evaluating the clinical diagnosis of patients with chronic heart failure. Methods: We conducted a single-center-based retrospective study including 343 consecutive patients enrolled between January 2019 to April 2020, all of whom presented with suspected symptoms of heart failure within one month. All enrolled cases performed cardiac ultrasound and coronary CT scans. The CT images were analyzed using accurate left ventricle (AccuLV) artificial intelligence (AI) software to calculate the ejection fraction-computed tomography (EF-CT) and it was compared with the ejection fraction (EF) obtained based on ultrasound. Cardiac insufficiency was determined if the EF measured by ultrasound was below 50%. Diagnostic performance analysis, correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plot were used to compare agreement between EF-CT and CT. Results: Of the 319 successfully performed patients, 220 (69%) were identified as cardiac insufficiency. Quantitative consistency analysis showed a good correlation between EF-CT and EF values in all cases (R square =0.704, r=0.837). Bland-Altman analysis showed mean bias of 6.6%, mean percentage error of 27.5% and 95% limit of agreement of -17% to 30% between EF and EF-CT. The results of the qualitative diagnostic study showed that the sensitivity and specificity of EF measured by coronary CT reached a high level of 91% [95% confidence interval (CI): 86-94%], and the positive diagnostic value was up to 96% (95% CI: 92-98%). Conclusions: The EF-CT and EF have excellent agreement, and AccuLV-based AI left ventricular function analysis software perhaps can be used as a clinical diagnostic reference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.