ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Ultrasound image denoising autoencoder model based on lightweight attention mechanism.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wavelet-enhanced autoencoder based image denoising with CNN fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The presence of noise in medical ultrasound images significantly degrades image quality and affects the accuracy of disease diagnosis. The convolutional neural network-denoising autoencoder (CNN-DAE) model extracts feature information by stacking regularly sized kernels. This results in the loss of texture detail, the over-smoothing of the image, and a lack of generalizability for speckle noise. Methods: A lightweight attention denoise-convolutional neural network (LAD-CNN) is proposed in the present study. Two different lightweight attention blocks (i.e., the lightweight channel attention (LCA) block and the lightweight large-kernel attention (LLA) block are concatenated into the downsampling stage and the upsampling stage, respectively. A skip connection is included before the upsampling layer to alleviate the problem of gradient vanishing during backpropagation. The effectiveness of our model was evaluated using both subjective visual effects and objective evaluation metrics. Results: With the highest peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) values at all noise levels, the proposed model outperformed the other models. In the test of brachial plexus ultrasound images, the average PSNR of our model was 0.15 higher at low noise levels and 0.33 higher at high noise levels than the suboptimal model. In the test of fetal ultrasound images, the average PSNR of our model was 0.23 higher at low noise levels and 0.20 higher at high noise levels than the suboptimal model. The statistical analysis showed that the p values were less than 0.05, which indicated a statistically significant difference between our model and the other models. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the proposed LAD-CNN model is more efficient in denoising and preserving image details than both conventional denoising algorithms and existing deep-learning algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.