ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
One-stop detection of anterior cruciate ligament injuries on magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning with multicenter validation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to radiologists for anterior cruciate ligament tears on MRI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- AI demonstrates comparable diagnostic performance to radiologists in MRI detection of anterior cruciate ligament tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical validation of fully automated (peri-)articular tissue analysis for assessing osteoarthritis progression: A narrative review.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Review
- Recent topics in musculoskeletal imaging focused on clinical applications of AI: How should radiologists approach and use AI?La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Models to Detect Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on MRI: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are closely associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, diagnosing ACL injuries based on knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been subjective and time-consuming for clinical doctors. Therefore, we aimed to devise a deep learning (DL) model leveraging MRI to enable a comprehensive and automated approach for the detection of ACL injuries. Methods: A retrospective study was performed extracting data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). A total of 1,589 knees (comprising 1,443 intact, 90 with partial tears, and 56 with full tears) were enrolled to construct the classification model. This one-stop detection pipeline was developed using a tailored YOLOv5m architecture and a ResNet-18 convolutional neural network (CNN) to facilitate tasks based on sagittal 2-dimensional (2D) intermediate-weighted fast spin-echo sequence at 3.0T. To ensure the reliability and robustness of the classification system, it was subjected to external validation across 3 distinct datasets. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the mean average precision (mAP) were utilized as the evaluation metric for the model performance by employing a 5-fold cross-validation approach. The radiologist's interpretations were employed as the reference for conducting the evaluation. Results: The localization model demonstrated an accuracy of 0.89 and a sensitivity of 0.93, achieving a mAP score of 0.96. The classification model demonstrated strong performance in detecting intact, partial tears, and full tears at the optimal threshold on the internal dataset, with sensitivities of 0.941, 0.833, and 0.929, specificities of 0.925, 0.947, and 0.991, and accuracies of 0.940, 0.941, and 0.989, respectively. In comparison, on a subset consisting of 171 randomly selected knees from the OAI, the radiologists demonstrated a sensitivity ranging between 0.660 and 1.000, specificity ranging between 0.691 and 1.000, and accuracy ranging between 0.689 and 1.000. On a subset consisting of 170 randomly selected knees from the Chinese dataset, the radiologists exhibited a sensitivity ranging between 0.711 and 0.948, specificity ranging between 0.768 and 0.977, and accuracy ranging between 0.683 and 0.917. After retraining, the model achieved sensitivities ranging between 0.630 and 0.961, specificities ranging between 0.860 and 0.961, and accuracies ranging between 0.832 and 0.951, respectively, on the external validation dataset. Conclusions: The proposed model utilizing knee MRI showcases robust performance in the domains of ACL localization and classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.