ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Evaluation of parietal pleural adhesion and invasion in subpleural lung cancer: value of B-mode ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on imaging prediction of pleural adhesion: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- ICG combined with medical adhesive in preoperative localization of complex pulmonary nodules: a retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Evaluation of parietal pleural invasion in subpleural lung cancer by VEGFR2 targeted microbubble-based ultrasound molecular imaging.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- A Dual-Modality Ultrasound Video Recognition Model for Distinguishing Subpleural Pulmonary Nodules.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2025Article
- Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pulmonary consolidation in children with community-acquired pneumonia.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Advances in the clinical diagnosis of lung cancer using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The parietal pleural adhesion/invasion of lung cancer can contribute substantially to poor prognosis and difficulty in surgery. The value of ultrasound in evaluating the parietal pleural adhesion or invasion (pleural adhesion/invasion) of lung cancer remains uncertain. This study investigated the value of B-mode ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing parietal pleural adhesion/invasion of subpleural lung cancer. Methods: The study animals included 40 male New Zealand white rabbits. A rabbit subpleural lung cancer model was constructed by injecting VX2 tumor tissue under ultrasound guidance. In the 1-3 weeks after subpleural lesion formation, parietal pleural adhesion/invasion of the largest subpleural lesion was evaluated with B-mode ultrasound and CEUS by two sonographers. The parietal pleural adhesion/invasion was also determined using the gold standard method of findings from anatomical and pathological examination. Results: Ultimately, 34 rabbits were subjected to complete ultrasonic evaluation. There were 20 and 14 cases with and without parietal pleural adhesion/invasion, respectively, as confirmed by anatomical and pathological evaluations. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of sonographer 1 using B-mode ultrasound were 50.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.0-74.0%], 100%, and 70.6% (95% CI: 54.5-86.7%), respectively; for CEUS, they were 90.0% (95% CI: 75.6-100.0%), 100.0%, and 94.1% (95% CI: 85.8-100.0%), respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of sonographer 2 using B-mode ultrasound were 45.0% (95% CI: 21.1-68.9%), 92.9% (95% CI: 77.5-100.0%), and 64.7% (95% CI: 47.8-81.6%), respectively; for CEUS, they were 85.0% (95% CI: 67.9-100.0%), 100.0%, and 91.2% (95% CI: 81.1-100.0%), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of sonographer 1 was higher with CEUS than with B-mode ultrasound, but not significantly so (94.1% Conclusions: Based on an animal model, B-mode ultrasound and CEUS both exhibited good diagnostic efficacy and interrater reliability in evaluating parietal pleural adhesion/invasion of subpleural lung cancer although CEUS outperformed B-mode ultrasound for both measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.