Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720834›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Evaluation of tubal patency based on peak injection pressure in four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography among infertile females: a preliminary study.

Ling Wang, Xin Chen, Min He, Sha Hu, Quanlin Ren, Xiaoying Qi, Yifei Tan, Hong Luo

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ling Wang *Department of Ultrasound, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin Chen *Department of Ultrasound, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Min HeDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sha HuDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Quanlin RenDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoying QiDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yifei TanDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hong LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the application of four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (4D-HyCoSy) has relatively good diagnostic accuracy for assessing the patency of the fallopian tubes, the evaluation process mainly relies on morphological findings of the fallopian tubes and pelvic cavity. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship of peak injection pressure during 4D-HyCoSy and tubal patency to provide a quantitative indicator for the evaluation of fallopian tube patency. Methods: This study included infertile patients who underwent 4D-HyCoSy and laparoscopic chromopertubation (LC) between 2020 and 2022, with LC serving as the reference test for assessing tubal patency. For the HyCoSy procedure, the ultrasound contrast agent was injected automatically using a liquid injection machine, and real-time pressure values were recorded. Patients were classified based on tubal patency status in LC as bilaterally patent, unilaterally patent, or bilaterally nonpatent. The average peak injection pressure and contrast agent volume of different groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to determine the cutoff value. Results: A total of 268 infertile patients were enrolled in the study. With LC as the standard examination, the sensitivity and specificity of 4D-HyCoSy in diagnosing nonpatent fallopian tubes were 91.1% and 95.1%, respectively. In general, peak injection pressure was observed to gradually increase as tubal patency decreased (P<0.001), with average peak injection pressures of 233.5±66.3, 338.8±99.8, and 469.6±63.1 mmHg in the bilaterally patent, unilaterally patent, and bilaterally nonpatent groups, respectively. The volume of contrast agent used in patients in the bilaterally nonpatent group was significantly lower than that in the other two groups (P<0.01), with average volumes of 22.7±6.3, 24.3±9.3, and 18.9±9.2 mL, respectively. When one fallopian tube was patent, the area under the curve (AUC) for distinguishing obstruction from patency of the other fallopian tube was 0.827, with a sensitivity of 79.8% and a specificity of 74.3% (cutoff value: 254.3 mmHg). Similarly, when one fallopian tube was nonpatent, the AUC was 0.866, with a sensitivity of 90.6% and a specificity of 78.3% (cutoff value: 401.3 mmHg). Conclusions: Peak injection pressure during 4D-HyCoSy demonstrates promising diagnostic performance in evaluating fallopian tube patency in infertile patients.

Indexed as

Fallopian tube patencyfour-dimensional hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (4D-HyCoSy)laparoscopic chromopertubation (LC)peak injection pressure

Identifiers

PMID38720834
PMCPMC11074734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.