ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparing the efficacy of single-skill and multiple-skill simulation scenarios in advancing clinical nursing competency.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and practice of a four-dimensional integrated one-stop outpatient service model based on patient journey mapping.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Effective strategies for cultivating rapid response, team collaboration, and stress resistance in emergency standardized training nurses during real rescue.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of single-skill and multiple skills patient care simulation scenarios in enhancing nursing competency and to evaluate nurses' perceptions of these different simulation scenarios. Methods: A mixed-method design was used. In the quantitative part, 130 newly hired nurses with less than one year of experience participated in this study. For the qualitative part, a subset of 26 of these nurses was selected for in-depth interviews until data saturation was achieved. The study was conducted in the simulation-based learning (SBL) lab in a specialized Jordan cancer center. Data collection took place between June 2022 and March 2023. Results: A significant difference was found in the IV skill between single and multiple skills scenarios; the mean score for the single-skill group was 44.42 (SD = 3.85), the mean score for the multiple-skill group was 45.63 (SD = 2.26) (P = 0.014). Moreover, a significant difference was found between the pre-and post-test scores for single-skill and multiple-skill groups. The mean score for the medication skill scenario pre-intervention single group was (M = 23.90, SD = 5.33); however, the score was increased post-intervention (M = 45.38, SD = 3.33), (P = <.001). Furthermore, the mean score was raised in the multiple skills medication scenario from (M = 22.92, SD = 5.44) to (M = 45.72, SD = 2.75), (<.001). Conclusion: Participants in both groups reported similar findings regarding physical exhaustion, scenario management, and overall satisfaction with the simulation experience. Loss of concentration and memory was reported more with multiple competencies simulation scenarios; this might indicate that this scenario has more cognitive load than the Single Competency Scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.