ArticleHeliyon2024
A framework for performance enhancement of classifiers in detection of prostate cancer from microarray gene.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative analysis of urinary microRNAs for prostate cancer detection: A proof-of-concept study.Translational oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a major world health problem for men. This shows how important early detection and accurate diagnosis are for better treatment and patient outcomes. This study compares different ways to find Prostate Cancer (PCa) and label tumors as normal or abnormal, with the goal of speeding up current work in microarray gene data analysis. The study looks at how well several feature extraction methods work with three feature selection strategies: Harmonic Search (HS), Firefly Algorithm (FA), and Elephant Herding Optimization (EHO). The techniques tested are Expectation Maximization (EM), Nonlinear Regression (NLR), K-means, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT). Eight classifiers are used for the task of classification. These are Random Forest, Decision Tree, Adaboost, XGBoost, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) with linear, polynomial, and radial basis function kernels. This study looks at how well these classifiers work with and without feature selection methods. It finds that the SVM with radial basis function kernel, using DCT for feature extraction and EHO for feature selection, does the best of all of them, with an accuracy of 94.8 % and an error rate of 5.15 %.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.