ArticleHeliyon2024
The efficacy and safety of the novel combination lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Endometrial carcinoma is the most widespread gynecological cancer, with increasing morbidity and mortality. Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets PD1 receptor tumors, is approved for patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) solid tumors. Many clinical trials and observational studies have been conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab combination therapy in the setting of endometrial cancer. However, results have been inconsistent, and current data is based on a heterogeneous population. The primary objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for endometrial cancer. Data sources: The search was conducted from inception from four databases; PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The electronic database search was conducted from inception to August 20, 2023. Study eligibility criteria: We considered randomized controlled trials and single-arm observational studies, i.e. cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. Methodology: We performed a single-arm meta-analysis, involving 7 studies having a total of 495 patients with endometrial cancer were eventually included which had the following outcomes: Complete response, Partial response, Progression-free survival, stable disease, progressive disease, safety outcomes, Adverse events, and the total number of deaths. Results: Our results showed that 88.6 % of the patients were positive for non-MSI-H/pMMR tumors (95 % CI = 0.825-0.927) whereas 6.5 % (95 % CI = 3.8-9.8 %) of the patients for MSI-H/dMMR tumors. The pooled objective response of endometrial cancer patients treated with Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab was 36.5 % (95 % CI = 0.258-0.471), the pooled estimate of complete and partial response was 47 % (95 % CI = 0.024-0.070) and 31.3 % (95 % CI = 0.230-0.396). 38.2 % patients had stable disease (95 % CI = 0.329-0.435) and 24.0 % patients had progressive disease (95 % CI = 0.103-0.378). The pooled median progression-free survival was 5.97 (95 % CI 5.43-7.63) months and, whereas the median overall survival was 17.19 months (95 % CI 15.34-19.31). All grade adverse events occurred in 85 % and Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 39 % of patients during the therapy whereas death occurred in 23.8 % during the treatment. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis concludes that although the combined treatment of a Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab had a PFS and OS that was inferior to the standard therapy used to treat advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer, it is still a novel treatment and shows potential for further research with a greater sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.