Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720675›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2024

Ultrasound deep learning radiomics and clinical machine learning models to predict low nuclear grade, ER, PR, and HER2 receptor status in pure ductal carcinoma

Meng Zhu, Yalan Kuang, Zekun Jiang, Jingyan Liu, Heqing Zhang, Haina Zhao, Honghao Luo, Yujuan Chen, Yulan Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meng ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yalan KuangDepartment of Ultrasound and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zekun JiangDepartment of Ultrasound and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jingyan LiuDepartment of Ultrasound and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Heqing ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Haina ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Honghao LuoDepartment of Ultrasound and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yujuan ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yulan PengDepartment of Ultrasound and West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low nuclear grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients can adopt proactive management strategies to avoid unnecessary surgical resection. Different personalized treatment modalities may be selected based on the expression status of molecular markers, which is also predictive of different outcomes and risks of recurrence. DCIS ultrasound findings are mostly non mass lesions, making it difficult to determine boundaries. Currently, studies have shown that models based on deep learning radiomics (DLR) have advantages in automatic recognition of tumor contours. Machine learning models based on clinical imaging features can explain the importance of imaging features. Methods: The available ultrasound data of 349 patients with pure DCIS confirmed by surgical pathology [54 low nuclear grade, 175 positive estrogen receptor (ER+), 163 positive progesterone receptor (PR+), and 81 positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+)] were collected. Radiologists extracted ultrasonographic features of DCIS lesions based on the 5 Results: In the training dataset, low nuclear grade, ER+, PR+, and HER2+ DCIS lesions accounted for 19.20%, 65.12%, 61.21%, and 30.19%, respectively; the validation set, they consisted of 19.30%, 62.50%, 57.14%, and 30.91%, respectively. In the DLR models we developed, the best AUC values for identifying features were 0.633 for identifying low nuclear grade, completed by the XGBoost Classifier of ResNet50; 0.618 for identifying ER, completed by the RF Classifier of InceptionV3; 0.755 for identifying PR, completed by the XGBoost Classifier of InceptionV3; and 0.713 for identifying HER2, completed by the LR Classifier of ResNet50. The CML models had better performance than DLR in predicting low nuclear grade, ER+, PR+, and HER2+ DCIS lesions. The best AUC values by classification were as follows: for low nuclear grade by RF classification, AUC: 0.719; for ER+ by XGBoost classification, AUC: 0.761; for PR+ by XGBoost classification, AUC: 0.780; and for HER2+ by RF classification, AUC: 0.723. Conclusions: Based on small-scale datasets, our study showed that the DLR models developed using RadImageNet pretrained network and CML models may help predict low nuclear grade, ER+, PR+, and HER2+ DCIS lesions so that patients benefit from hierarchical and personalized treatment.

Indexed as

deep learning (DL)ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)nuclear gradeRadiomicsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38720675
PMCPMC11074652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.