Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720654›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Improving broiler health through cecal microbiota transplantation: a comprehensive study on growth, immunity, and microbial diversity.

Anam Khalid, Zhengxuan Huang, Ibrar Muhammad Khan, Fatima Khalid, Nourhan Nassar, Xinyu Jiang, Maoji Cheng, Kai Zhan, Zaigui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anam KhalidCollege of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, 230036, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Zhengxuan HuangCollege of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, 230036, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Ibrar Muhammad KhanCollege of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, 230036, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Fatima KhalidCollege of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, 230036, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Nourhan NassarCollege of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, 230036, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Xinyu JiangCollege of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, 230036, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Maoji ChengFisugarpeptide Biology Engineering Co. Ltd., Anhui 237000, People's Republic of China.
Kai ZhanAnhui Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Product Safety Engineering, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 230031 Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Zaigui WangCollege of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, 230036, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cecal microbiota has emerged as a prominent intervention target for improving the production and welfare of poultry. This is essential for the overall health and performance of broiler chickens. The current study focused on investigating the effect of cecal microbiota transplantation (CMT) from healthy donor chickens on the growth performance, immunity, and microbial composition of newly hatched chicks and evaluated the effect of sample storage on the microbial diversity of the cecal samples. A healthy "Wannan Yellow Chicken line" was selected as the donor, and 180 1-d-old chicks from the same line were used as recipients for a 60-d feed trial. The chicks were randomly allocated to three groups (60 birds per group) with three replicates in each group. The three treatment groups were CMT-0 (control, normal saline solution), CMT-I (1:12 cecal content, normal saline supplemented with 10% glycerol), and CMT-II (1:6 cecal content, normal saline supplemented with 10% glycerol). The results of weight gain and absolute organ weight showed significant improvements in the CMT-II group compared with the CMT-0 group. Serum IgG level was significantly improved (P < 0.05) in CMT-I compared with that in the CMT-0. However, IL-6 levels increased in CMT-I and then significantly decreased in CMT-II. The cecal microbial diversity of CMT treatment was compared between two groups, fresh samples (FS) and stored samples at-80 °C (SS). The results showed that beneficial taxa, such as Firmicutes and Verrucomicrobiota, were substantially more abundant in both CMT-I and CMT-II than in CMT-0 in both FS and SS. Microbial function analysis at levels 1, 2, and 3 showed improved metabolism, genetic information processing, cellular processes, environmental information processing, and organismal systems in CMT-I and CMT-II for both FS and SS groups. However, the SS group showed decreased microbial diversity and function. To conclude, cecal microbiota transplantation is a promising strategy for enhancing the productivity and health of broiler chickens.

Indexed as

CecumChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsDietFecal Microbiota TransplantationMaleRandom Allocationcecal microbiota transplantationchickengrowth performanceimmunitymicrobial diversitystorage condition

Identifiers

PMID38720654
PMCPMC11259951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.