Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720398›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2024

Using policy codesign to achieve multi-sector alignment in adolescent behavioral health: a study protocol.

Sarah Cusworth Walker, Kym R Ahrens, Mandy D Owens, McKenna Parnes, Joe Langley, Christine Ackerley, Jonathan Purtle, Lisa Saldana, Gregory A Aarons, Aaron Hogue and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah Cusworth WalkerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. secwalkr@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-7451
Kym R AhrensSeattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mandy D OwensAddictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
McKenna ParnesSeattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joe LangleyLab For Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Christine AckerleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Jonathan PurtleDepartment of Public Health Policy and Management, Global Center for Implementation Science, New York University, New York City, USA.
Lisa SaldanaChestnut Health Systems, Lighthouse Institute, Eugene, OR, USA.
Gregory A AaronsDepartment of Psychiatry, UC San Diego ACTRI Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Aaron HoguePartnership to End Addiction, New York, NY, USA.
Lawrence A PalinkasHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

Using policy codesign to achieve multi-sector alignment in adolescent behavioral healthR34DA058806 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WALKER, SARAH CUSWORTH · 2023 to 2025
$720k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R34DA058806-01NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA058806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicymaking is quickly gaining focus in the field of implementation science as a potential opportunity for aligning cross-sector systems and introducing incentives to promote population health, including substance use disorders (SUD) and their prevention in adolescents. Policymakers are seen as holding the necessary levers for realigning service infrastructure to more rapidly and effectively address adolescent behavioral health across the continuum of need (prevention through crisis care, mental health, and SUD) and in multiple locations (schools, primary care, community settings). The difficulty of aligning policy intent, policy design, and successful policy implementation is a well-known challenge in the broader public policy and public administration literature that also affects local behavioral health policymaking. This study will examine a blended approach of coproduction and codesign (i.e., Policy Codesign), iteratively developed over multiple years to address problems in policy formation that often lead to poor implementation outcomes. The current study evaluates this scalable approach using reproducible measures to grow the knowledge base in this field of study.

methodsThis is a single-arm, longitudinal, staggered implementation study to examine the acceptability and short-term impacts of Policy Codesign in resolving critical challenges in behavioral health policy formation. The aims are to (1) examine the acceptability, feasibility, and reach of Policy Codesign within two geographically distinct counties in Washington state, USA; (2) examine the impact of Policy Codesign on multisector policy development within these counties using social network analysis; and (3) assess the perceived replicability of Policy Codesign among leaders and other staff of policy-oriented state behavioral health intermediary organizations across the USA. DISCUSSION: This study will assess the feasibility of a specific approach to collaborative policy development, Policy Codesign, in two diverse regions. Results will inform a subsequent multi-state study measuring the impact and effectiveness of this approach for achieving multi-sector and evidence informed policy development in adolescent SUD prevention and treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentBehavioral healthEvidence useFormationPolicy designSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID38720398
PMCPMC11077850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.