Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720391›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

Impact of deep learning image reconstruction on volumetric accuracy and image quality of pulmonary nodules with different morphologies in low-dose CT.

L D'hondt, C Franck, P-J Kellens, F Zanca, D Buytaert, A Van Hoyweghen, H El Addouli, K Carpentier, M Niekel, M Spinhoven and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

L D'hondtDepartment of Human structure and repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Proeftuinstraat 86, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. louisdho.dhondt@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4297-5140
C FranckDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, Belgium.
P-J KellensDepartment of Human structure and repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Proeftuinstraat 86, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
F ZancaCenter of Medical Physics in Radiology, Leuven University, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.
D BuytaertCardiovascular Research Center, OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, Aalst, Belgium.
A Van HoyweghenDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, Belgium.
H El AddouliDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, Belgium.
K CarpentierDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, Belgium.
M NiekelDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, Belgium.
M SpinhovenDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, Belgium.
K Bacher *Department of Human structure and repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Proeftuinstraat 86, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
A Snoeckx *Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0B1922N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study systematically compares the impact of innovative deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR, TrueFidelity) to conventionally used iterative reconstruction (IR) on nodule volumetry and subjective image quality (IQ) at highly reduced radiation doses. This is essential in the context of low-dose CT lung cancer screening where accurate volumetry and characterization of pulmonary nodules in repeated CT scanning are indispensable. MATERIALS AND

methodsA standardized CT dataset was established using an anthropomorphic chest phantom (Lungman, Kyoto Kaguku Inc., Kyoto, Japan) containing a set of 3D-printed lung nodules including six diameters (4 to 9 mm) and three morphology classes (lobular, spiculated, smooth), with an established ground truth. Images were acquired at varying radiation doses (6.04, 3.03, 1.54, 0.77, 0.41 and 0.20 mGy) and reconstructed with combinations of reconstruction kernels (soft and hard kernel) and reconstruction algorithms (ASIR-V and DLIR at low, medium and high strength). Semi-automatic volumetry measurements and subjective image quality scores recorded by five radiologists were analyzed with multiple linear regression and mixed-effect ordinal logistic regression models.

resultsVolumetric errors of nodules imaged with DLIR are up to 50% lower compared to ASIR-V, especially at radiation doses below 1 mGy and when reconstructed with a hard kernel. Also, across all nodule diameters and morphologies, volumetric errors are commonly lower with DLIR. Furthermore, DLIR renders higher subjective IQ, especially at the sub-mGy doses. Radiologists were up to nine times more likely to score the highest IQ-score to these images compared to those reconstructed with ASIR-V. Lung nodules with irregular margins and small diameters also had an increased likelihood (up to five times more likely) to be ascribed the best IQ scores when reconstructed with DLIR.

conclusionWe observed that DLIR performs as good as or even outperforms conventionally used reconstruction algorithms in terms of volumetric accuracy and subjective IQ of nodules in an anthropomorphic chest phantom. As such, DLIR potentially allows to lower the radiation dose to participants of lung cancer screening without compromising accurate measurement and characterization of lung nodules.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary NoduleAnthropomorphic chest phantomComputed tomographyDeep learning image reconstructionImage qualityIterative reconstructionLung cancer screeningNodule morphologyNodule volumetry

Identifiers

PMID38720391
PMCPMC11080267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.