Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38720387›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Reliability and validity of the short version of the childhood abuse self report scale in Chinese college students.

Yali Zhang, Jinxia Zhao, Yuewen Bian, Fuhai Zhang

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yali ZhangCollege of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jinxia ZhaoCollege of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yuewen BianCollege of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Fuhai ZhangCollege of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China. fuhaizhang991@sina.com.

Funding

Science Research Project of Hebei Education Department SQ2024178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reliability and validity of the current scale for measuring childhood abuse in China are worrying. The development of the Short Version of the Childhood Abuse Self Report Scale (CASRS-12) helps to change this situation, but the effectiveness of the tool has not yet been tested in Chinese participants. This study aims to test the reliability and validity of the CASRS‑12 in Chinese college students.

methodsA total of 932 college students were investigated, of whom 418 were investigated for the first time, and only the CASRS‑12 was filled out. In the second survey, 514 participants filled out the CASRS‑12, Depression Scale, Self-esteem Scale and Subjective Well-being Scale in turn. After 4 weeks, 109 participants were selected for retest.

resultsEach item of the CASRS‑12 had good discrimination. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (χ

conclusionThe Chinese version of CASRS‑12 meets the measurement standard and could be used to measure the level of childhood abuse of Chinese college students.

Indexed as

PsychometricsSelf ReportStudentsAdolescentAdultAdult Survivors of Child AbuseChildChild AbuseChinaDepressionFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsChildhood abuseChildhood maltreatmentCollege studentsReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID38720387
PMCPMC11080228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.